Where has the U.S. economy actually been stable?
Compare all 11 GICS sectors across economic, corporate and market resilience during the Trump administration—without confusing high returns with low risk.
Return is not resilience
The upper-left is the conventional defensive zone: lower volatility with positive return. Bubble size reflects maximum drawdown.
Build your definition of stability
Change the importance of economic, corporate and market evidence. Scores are analytical indices built from the documented evidence—not investment ratings.
Sector evidence table
| Sector | Return | Volatility | Max drawdown | Stability view | Primary policy tension |
|---|
Four defensible cases
These sectors qualify for different reasons. Click any sector in the table for its full evidence profile.
Demand, jobs and market behavior aligned.
Essential demand and 378,500 additional health-care jobs supported economic resilience; XLV’s drawdown was five points smaller than SPY’s.
The quietest stocks were not the winners.
The sector posted the lowest volatility and smallest drawdown, but trailed SPY by roughly 22 percentage points.
Stable demand met an unstable financing environment.
Regulated revenue and record power-demand prospects supported operations, while high rates and grid capex constrained shareholder returns.
Defense strength masked manufacturing pressure.
Defense budgets and backlogs supported one side; tariffs and softer factory output pressured trade-sensitive manufacturers and transportation.
What the data actually says
Seven specific findings designed to survive a skeptical reading.
The most stable sector was not the best performer.
Consumer staples had the lowest volatility and smallest drawdown, yet significantly lagged the broad market.
Health care had the strongest all-around case.
Its market behavior was defensive, while its labor-market contribution was unusually large.
Technology was resilient—not stable.
AI-led earnings and prices surged, but investors absorbed the highest volatility and deepest sector drawdown.
Utilities’ businesses were steadier than their stocks.
Power demand grew, but capital intensity and elevated financing costs weakened the market result.
Energy was an inflation hedge, not a safe harbor.
The sector beat SPY modestly, but its volatility was second only to technology.
Industrials contained policy winners and losers.
Defense spending supported backlogs; tariffs raised costs for manufacturers that consume imported metals and components.
Headline labor stability hid concentration.
Health care supplied most of the net job growth while information, financial activities and government contracted.
Sources and method
Official releases and established market research. Links open outside the app.